Go Mr. Drysdale! He is definitely living up to his show name, "Pickwick's Mr. High Falutin" and rocking the show ring! At his very first official dog show, in the 6-9 puppy class, Drysdale scored BOTH of his majors plus 8 points toward his championship. Now that's a way to start off a show career. Now, we can just relax and have some fun! (Perhaps learn to hold a stack on the table a bit better ;) and not give the furry eyeball look when the judge examines him HA). He is young and this is that age when they can go through a fear phase (just in time to start a show career, eh?) so I have no doubt he will learn to be more comfortable at these shows. In his defense, the Greenville Convention Center was SO loud and the amplification of the singer for the National Anthem JUST before he was to enter the ring almost blasted my ear drums. Dogs are even more sensitive with their hearing so I can't imagine what he was going through! (And, yes, she did go up for that high note lolz. Beautiful voice, just amplified too much). Here are some shots of Mr. Drysdale having some fun, from his first puppy match at 3 months of age in Tallahassee Florida, to his march in a Mardis Gras parade, to his BPUPs (along with his brother Jethro) in Columbiana and other locations, to his first official show in Greenville July, 2023 at the Carolina Foothills Cluster . . . .
0 Comments
Tory, (Pickwick's Worship the Ground I Walk On) from the Coffee House litter has been the best little show girl. Truly, she has the best temperament of any pug we've ever owned, yet alone bred. What a bombproof, fun, sweet pug. We can't wait to get started on some new fun things like Rally and her Pugiano act now that we got that conformation championship out of the way. It was also tough finding majors (on the weekends we were able to get away to a dog show etc.) but, along the way, we managed to find 2 shows with majors -- Hattiesburg, MS and Greenville, SC -- and she managed to score some nice wins along the way, like Best of Breed, Winners Bitch, Best of Winners, Best Bred by Exhibitor, Best of Breed Owner Handled, Best Puppy, Toy Group 1, and more Best of Breeds in the BPUP. I know her mama Marie Claire is smiling down from heaven and so proud and I know Marie's legacy with tricks, Pugiano act, and just being an incredible pug will live on through Tory. Her littermates are also excelling ... Petunia in Mexico just received yet another title, this time CGC Urban! Here are some photos of Tory's adventure working toward her AKC championship, starting back with her big wins in BPUP all the way through her huge 5 point major in Greenville, SC out of an incredible (and huge) lineup of pugs in her Bred By Class...
It was Pickwick Pugs turn to shine at the Carolina Foothills Dog Show cluster in Greenville, South Carolina. Pickwick's Worship the Ground I Walk On (Tory), Pickwick's Captain of Nampara (Winston), and Pickwick's Mr. High Falutin' (Mr. Drysdale) won all sorts of ribbons and had a blast. Tory finished her championship and Mr Drysdale picked up 2 major wins (one was a 5 point!) so he now has 8 points towards his championship, both majors, all from 6-9 puppy class at his FIRST SHOW! Winston won Reserve Winners Dog and actually beat out Mr. Drysdale too. Winston and Mr Drysdale really seemed to have fun playing and hanging out together. Here they are playing at the dog park at the hotel. Everyone one some purple ribbons .... Tory got that final major (a 5 point!) to finish her championship. Winston was especially amazing because he has never been a show dog before. He learned so fast and was incredible at the LOUD show with all the sounds, sights, smells, (which can be scary for some dogs). The event was held in the Greenville Convention Center which was very nice but HUGE. Not once did his tail go down! He was a trooper learning how to walk on a show lead (he went to a couple of handling classes prior) and a trooper meeting all the people, fellow pugs, and even judges! Wow. His family lives in a nearby city and they SO graciously agreed to allow Winston to have this last hoorah before he is neutered next week. I can't say enough amazing things about how well Winston behaved -- bombproof - and this was a testimony to his wonderful family and the love and care they have shown him. Here he is winning his first purple and white ribbon ;) and his FIRST day as a weekend wonder show pug! We actually made a visit to the little yellow truck to collect on him in case he proves to grow out as amazing as he already is. We did the DNA health test swabs so all that would be left would be to see how his hips have matured by age 2. Winston's wonderful family let us work with him several weeks before the show to work on loose leash walking and "stacking" (standing still for examination) and such. Here he is when he came to visit the piano studio to train ;) and also when we got to see him the first time after he had grown up! We met at a coffee shop and we were just blown away at how amazing he looked -- his wonderful family had kept his nails so short, coat was divine, and the quality care and food was so obvious (he gets goat's milk every day!) We even met at Home Depot so he could train there with all the distractions . . . But it was so wonderful once we were safely home. Winston got a bath before his mommy and sister came to get him and I had a huge sigh of relief ... not because I wanted him to go, but because I was so so worried the whole time taking care of such precious cargo. I hope Winston will dream about his adventures for a long time but I know I'll cherish this trip and getting to be able to see how beautifully one of the pups from the Poldark Litter grew out. And how VERY loved he is. Can I tell you how excited he was when he saw his mom and sister?? Seriously, he just came alive when he saw them!! Here are some more shots of him on his adventure trip as a show pug and our celebration trip to Waterfall Park and for a whipped cream cup ;)
On the Good Dog website there is a wonderful definition of a Preservation Breeder.
"Preservation breeders provide certainty when it comes to the physical and behavioral traits of their purebred dogs and predictability regarding hereditary issues and health conditions. Without preservation breeders’ dedication and hard work, we wouldn’t have the breeds we know and love today. " As I mentioned in the last blog post, I would edit this slightly to read "Preservation breeders provide MORE certainty" or "more predictability". For when it comes to personality and temperament, no 2 pugs are alike and there are so many factors involved -- genetics, environment, what happens in the first 12 weeks, the puppy's experiences in the first 12 weeks, first year, diet, training, socialization, encounters. With regard to temperament, the formula for a breeder follows is: A + B = ? (most likely C, but could be XYZ). Think about it. If you have siblings, are you all alike? You might share similar traits -- probably learned behaviors -- but I'm willing to bet you are all slightly or perhaps even drastically different with regard to personality. As unique as our thumbprints, (isn't it truly miraculous that every single human has a different thumbprint?), so it is with personality. Even with pugs. Even with a littermates. Even when we have repeated a breeding -- with the same dam and sire -- each litter is unique, and each puppy is unique and very often completely different in temperament. To quote an older, quite experienced pug breeder of over 50 years: "You find a [sweet, confident, balanced and jolly girl], and a [sweet, confident, balanced and jolly boy], and then you just pray." There are so many factors which contribute to the ultimate personality a pug will have once it reaches stable emotional maturity around age 3-4. We work with the puppy during the first 12 weeks of its life and give it a solid start. But all of this work can actually be undone by a bad encounter or experience after 12 weeks, or simply by a lack of follow up over the next few years. Just because a puppy did all of the Puppy Culture protocols during its first 12 weeks of life, these protocols and training and habituation have to continue until the pug reaches stable emotional maturity around 3-4 years of age. As Jane Lindquist, the author of Puppy Culture, explains "It's not like you get a 'pass' just because you did [Puppy Culture]." "Temperament could be best described as a dog’s innate personality. It’s the genetic hand he or she was dealt when he or she was born and (epigenetics aside) will determine what he or she will pass on to his or her children. Behavior is the outward way that a dog acts – what he or she actually does. Behavior is the result of a complex interaction between genetics and environment. Behavior is modifiable. Temperament is not. But Temperament will dictate the outside limits of how much you can modify behavior. Just to make it more complicated, how easily you reach those outside limits are (e.g. how modifiable a dog’s behavior is) is in itself part of temperament. Two thoughts for you to ponder about this distinction: 1. Ethically, I feel called to do everything in my power to modify behavior before puppies leave my house in order to maximize the likelihood of them growing up to be behaviorally sound dogs that enhance the lives of the people they live with. This is what Puppy Culture is about. 2. But this places a burden on me not to confuse behavior with temperament. Ironically, our skill at raising puppies becomes a central challenge for us as dog breeders – how much SHOULD we need to modify behavior and what do we move forward with in our breeding programs? I absolutely believe that “normal” puppies require quite a bit of socialization/behavior modification in order to be good pets and working companions. But we have to be aware that, just because we modified a behavior, does not mean that the underlying temperament trait that produced the behavior is genetically erased." One reason we love to stay in touch with puppy owners is to see how temperament develops and how a puppy will end up around age 3-4. With a little behavior modification, humans can improve upon certain weaknesses in temperament. For example, through lots of socialization and confidence-building protocols, we were able to turn some of our more soft (shy) pups into show superstars. In truth, they never completely loved the show scene, but they were able to withstand it. Were they glad to retire? Yes. Do they thrive in our lap more than on the stage? Yes. Meanwhile, the confident, outgoing, natural show dogs who finished their championship quickly, "owning the ring" at 4 months of age, are quite bored now sitting on a lap. They need an audience. Genetically speaking, these pugs were either soft/shy, or confident/outgoing. (These were littermates, incidentally .... Lilly, and Miss Dior). We have had to work on behavior modification with both of them. With Lilly, to build confidence and the ability to handle loud noises and huge crowds; with Miss Dior, to stop barking at everyone (she demands to be noticed) and learn to settle. At 7.5 weeks, indeed, Lilly was dubbed "thoughtul" and Miss Dior was dubbed the show girl. We know, even with all our training and some success in working toward the middle of "the spectrum" that, by nature, they are soft and loud. So when we looked for mates when it was time to breed them we looked for more confident, jolly (let's say "clueless" ;) males for Lilly and super sweet and laidback males for Miss Dior. We were lucky. Ideally, with regard to temperament, when choosing a pug for future breeding, it's good to look for that middle-of-the-road puppy. And that's what we have do now. We have ruled out some amazing pugs conformationally speaking because they were just too aloof or independent. This "moderate in all ways" applies to conformation as well. It's funny, but I always remember my grandfather who would say "everything in moderation my dear." Jane Lindquist shed some insight in her experiences as a breeder. She had always had confident and bold pups. "We did an outcross in our last litter to move our temperaments in a softer direction. Our family of dogs have always been great pets with people, but I would say they had pretty low pack drive and were maybe 50/50 good with other dogs, with 40% being total angels with dogs of all kinds, 40% being good with dogs they live with but not wanting to deal with strange dogs, and 10% just terrible with other dogs. We also saw some restlessness creeping into in our lines and wanted to tone things down. Since we do performance and like to place dogs with people who do performance, we wanted to improve dog-friendliness and breed dogs who are less high-maintenance. So we outcrossed to a sweet lamb chop of a dog from the UK. Yes, we got great dog-friendliness, excellent pack drive and trainability but, guess what came with that? Yes, softness, sound sensitivity, and relative high level of fearfulness. And they displayed it from an surprisingly young age - they literally alarm barked two days after their ears opened. Totally different from any other Bull Terrier litter I have seen. To the point where we almost could not do the startle recovery protocols because they displayed true fear type reactions from three days after their ears opened - everything had to be GREATLY modified to keep their response where we wanted it, with a tiny startle and immediate recovery.��This early onset of fearfulness is, I think, decent evidence of the genetic component involved, but I also have to say that, as a professional dog trainer, I had had at least three students with dogs from this line over the last few years and had observed a few more dogs from this line, and that fearfulness/softness is definitely there - along side of the sweetness and dog-friendliness. So it wasn’t like I was going into this blind, I was just shocked at how overwhelmingly strong the genetics were for it. This litter’s PAT was unlike any of my other litters - perhaps not out of range for a different breed, but certainly nothing like my previous litters. So I took my own advice and went back home and used the next three weeks to double down on what needed to be done, with the help of our remarkable puppy owners and Gina Boderck. The results? Of the 8 surviving puppies, 7 are totally normal to bold. You would not know in a million years that they had tested “soft” in their PAT. However, despite months of work, one puppy remained fearful and soft to the point where we placed her as a pet, even though she was our pick puppy. But even that puppy is confident in the context of her own home or a familiar place and does not show any sound sensitivity in a familiar environment. What’s more, she does show enrichment seeking behavior in that when something scares her, she tries and tries to overcome and investigate. This is in stark contrast to the other non-PC dogs that I have seen with this kind of sensitivity, so I do chalk that up to Puppy Culture. This puppy is a great pet but just does not enjoy new places with a lot of commotion so never going to be a show/performance dog, and I don’t want that included in my lines. So that was a perfect example of both how genetics can dictate the limits of behavior modification but, even so, how well you really can do with behavior modification even with a very poor genetic prognosis." One of the lines from Puppy Culture is "The proof is in the pudding." To make pudding just right regarding personality, the formula is DNA + Breeder's protocols + Owner's training and protocols + Socialization and Environment + Diet + Quality Air + Aliens flying overhead + Venus Aligning with Mars + Goat's Milk + Comfy Beds Seriously though, yes genetics can dictate the limits of behavior modification but, in our experience, it's amazing what humans can do "with behavior modification even with very poor genetic prognosis." For more amazing tips from Puppy Culture for pug owners we highly (highly) recommend this course "With Open Arms and a Level Head - How to bring a Puppy into your life." "From transporting your puppy home through crate and house training, this course will give you a solid plan for bringing a new puppy into your life!" It is a continuation on what we have worked on with each puppy during its first 12 weeks of life. Yes, it is 8 it is 8 hours and 30 minutes but it will make the years to come with your pug so much more satisfying and rewarding for you and your puppy. It is (along with enrolling in Puppy Kindergarten and subsequent training classes for the first 3 years at minimum, along with regular training and socialization) your best chance at making sure that your puppy becomes the 3 years old pug you were hoping for! (Note - I will be updating this post with developments as they become available.) Preserve: "To keep from harm, damage, danger, evil, etc.; protect; save." (Webster's New World Dictionary) or "To keep in perfect or unaltered condition; maintain unchanged." (American Heritage Dictionary). Using these definitions then, to "preserve" a breed standard would be to keep the breed standard from harm, damage, danger, evil, etc.; protect; save." Or "to keep the breed standard in perfect or UNALTERED condition; MAINTAIN UNCHANGED." The term Preservation Breeder refers to those breeders who are working to preserve the breed standard and breed type. They complete all health tests recommended by the breed club, and very often additional testing (for example Pickwick Pugs adds spine, heart, and many other health screening tests). Preservation breeders are very different from
Preservation Breeder "Preservation breeders provide certainty when it comes to the physical and behavioral traits of their purebred dogs and predictability regarding hereditary issues and health conditions. Without preservation breeders’ dedication and hard work, we wouldn’t have the breeds we know and love today. " (This quote, from Good Dog website is wonderful, however, I will edit it slightly to "Preservation breeders provide MORE certainty ... or more predictability" for when it comes to personality and temperament no 2 pugs are alike. More on this subject in a different Blog post.) The mission statement of the American Kennel Club (AKC) reads: "The American Kennel Club (AKC) was founded in 1884 and its mission is to advocate for the purebred dog as a family companion, advance canine health and well-being, work to protect the rights of all dog owners and promote responsible dog ownership. The AKC and its affiliated organizations encourage dogs as family companions, advocate for dog owner rights, and educate the public about responsible dog ownership." Some key words in this for me -- purebred and health -- and what I'll be exploring in this blog post. "Purebred dogs are history and art. They are beauty and brains. They are living, breathing conduits to our past and to our future. They are our heart and our soul . . . . and they are so much more" as Laura Reeves writes in her fabulous article on the Good Dog Website. PUREBRED An article on the American Kennel Club (AKC) website explains why BREED STANDARDS ARE IMPORTANT. "AKC Conformation has existed for hundreds of years and was started as way to evaluate breeding stock. Dogs are not being compared to each other; they're being measure by how closely the conform to the standard of their particular breed. Why? Because the closer a dog's appearance is to the breeds' standard, the better that dog's ability will be to produce healthy, purpose-bred puppies that meet the standard." I'm going to repeat that last sentence the AKC wrote: " ...the closer a dog's appearance is to the breeds' standard, the better that dog's ability will be to produce healthy, purpose-bred puppies that meet the standard." -- American Kennel Club (AKC) "It's also the reason why mixed breeds and spayed or neutered purebreds are ineligible to compete in conformation. Responsible breeders breed dogs who have titles confirming that they adhere to the breed standard and/or are able to perform the duties for which they have been bred." So, when I learned today that the American Kennel Club (AKC) now allows pugs who are not breed standard -- mutts -- to be registered, I felt obligated as a preservation breeder to reach out for clarification and understanding of their reasonings for this decision. AKC is a well-run organization so I'm sure I'll get a response. But it's important for me as a preservation breeder to understand their motivation and reasoning. The future of the pug breed is at risk, so actually it's my duty as a preservation breeder to understand AKC's motives. WHY I LOVE & SUPPORT AKC I have a friend who works for AKC and she explained the vast amount of work their legal team does to a) allow us to even own pets b) allow us to breed dogs c) allow us to rescue dogs and on and on. AKC FIGHTS FOR OUR RIGHT TO OWN A PET Evidently, what most pet owners would consider "basic rights" are threatened regularly. AKC fights these bizarre activist groups who think that no one should own a pet. Period. That all pets should be killed (and they euthanize thousands of pets themselves to the point that the Federal government was alerted. There are reports from people who worked for these groups that they would steal pets out of owners' yards and then euthanize them. And everyone has seen them open crate doors at dog shows so that chaos ensues, causing dogs to escape outside risking being hit by a car, or large dogs attacking small dogs etc. etc. Perhaps you saw the person from one of these groups run out and attack the Best in Show Winner and try to steal the trophy?) So, yes, I'm so SO very grateful AKC battles these lunatics on a daily basis. I don't know how I woud get through life without a pet. Most people I know agree. But guess what? Not counting the domestic dog, who has been our partner for at least 15,000 years, the animal domestication process started about 12,000 years ago. These activist groups started in the 1980s. AKC SUPPORTS PRESERVATION BREEDERS She also explained how AKC constantly fights to allow preservation breeders to preserve the breeds. AKC fights daily to allow to pet owners to have healthy, amazing pets. As mentioned above, it is the smaller hobby show preservation breeder who ultimately preserves the breeds. Large commercial breeding facilities are essentially backyard breeders. Backyard breeders have no concern for breed preservation. (And there is a more detailed discussion on backyard breeders in another blog post.) AKC HELPS KEEP OUR DOGS THRIVING AND HAPPY To keep our dogs happy, AKC offers all sorts of amazing activities like Barnhunt, Agility, Rally Obedience, and to keep the Breed Standards pure and on the 'up-and-up', AKC offers Conformation shows. (Dog shows). So, again, as a breed preservationist, I'm grateful to AKC. As a pet owner, I'm grateful to AKC. As a champion of the pug breed, I'm grateful to AKC for their support in research and health. But now I'm confused and disillusioned. HOLD THE LINE - HOLD THE ALLELE There are only 2 colors in the Pug Breed Standard - Black and Fawn - yet AKC is now allowing backyard breeders to register white (albino) and brindle pugs. In AKC's mission statement it is mentioned that they support "purebred" dogs. How does registering mutts support this cause? I'm not a lawyer or a politician. I'm sure there is reasoning for this, but I don't see how AKC's endorsement of pugs who are not purebred will help our efforts to preserve the breed. Crossing ethical lines means violating the rules of decent behavior that are expected in a certain context or profession. When a preservation breeder purposefully breeds dogs who are not healthy, not conformationally sound, and not amazing representations of the breed standard, they "cross the line". Psychologically, when enough people "cross the ethical line", a cultural numbness and rationalization occurs and there are serious consequences. If a reputable breeder becomes numb a "kennel blindness" occurs as they become unaware of faults in their dog. They rationalize their way around this through denial. This is a big reason it is important for reputable breeders to "put themselves out there" regularly for judges and other experts to evaluate the dogs they hope to breed. Personally, I hate dog shows, but I participate in them and jump through this hoop because it is important to prevent "kennel blindness" and it is important to see what is out there -- the good, and the bad -- and be supportive of other reputable breeders as we help each other stay accountable, learn, grow, share new information, and renew our love and joy of the pug breed. ALLELE Our genes are inherited from our parents, and the different combinations of these genes make us unique. Genetic inheritance controls the characteristics of all living things.
Alleles may be either dominant or recessive:
Some characteristics are controlled by a single gene, such as fur in animals and red-green color blindness in humans. Each gene might have different forms, and these are called alleles. Most or all gene loci are highly polymorphic, (with multiple alleles). A number of genetic disorders are caused when an individual inherits 2 recessive alleles for a single-gene trait. Recessive genetic disorders include albinism, cystic fibrosis, galactosemia, phenylketonuria (PKU), and Tay–Sachs disease. Other disorders are also due to recessive alleles, but because the gene locus is located on the X chromosome, so that males have only one copy (that is, they are hemizygous), they are more frequent in males than in females. Examples include red-green color blindness and fragile X syndrome. Huntingdon's disease occurs when an individual inherits only one dominant allele. While it's true that introducing morphs would improve morphological diversity -- as there are more types in the gene pool -- it is not clear if this improves health. If the gene pool becomes too narrow over time there can be problem causing genes which piggy back along with the desired trait that aren't readily apparent. Generally, having more alleles (like brown coat, black coat etc.) means there is a less likely chance you will get something that is a concern when it is homozygous (when you have 2 copies of the risk gene, instead of one.) But it's not proven that introducing coat colors improves health, especially when you're talking broadly about a group level dynamic that occurs years and decades - we wouldn't really know until we see introductions of new coat color genes into breeds and monitor health dynamics over time. Yet, we DO know now that there are certain risks with different coat types, and this includes black coats, which have been identified with a higher risk of certain types of cancer. We also know albinism on its own (white pugs) brings problems. So, if AKC is thinking that introducing more colors will improve health, there is no proven science behind this. REALITY The only real science here is the fact that the only breeders who would be willing to dabble in "exotic colors" are the backyard breeders who a) do not do all of the required (even bare minimum) health screening testing b) do not do pedigree research c) do not have access to support from knowledgeable pug breeders d) do not have access to the best pugs for breeding (no reputable breeder would offer stud service to someone wanting to create an albino or blue-eyed pug, for example) c) do not breed to standard d) are not concerned about preserving the breed and totally fine to pass off mutts (long haired, blue-eyed, odd colored pugs) as "exotic" and con the buyer out of obscene amounts of money e) well, we could include the entire alphabet here, but I'll stop. I think we all know the problems that result from backyard breeders. Let's talk about what we do know. Science. The Brindle and White (albino) colors -- which AKC now registers -- do not naturally occur in the pug. They are recessive genes. By adding new “exotic” colors to the pug breed we are adding more health challenges. When you start monkeying around with the colors you have health concerns. For example, with the albino pugs ("white pugs"), there is a weakened immune system, sensitivity to light and more risk of skin cancer, deafness (albinism has long been associated with hearing loss in many animals, including dogs), low intelligence. But let's list just a few of the top concerns:
Once again, breeders adding white, albino pugs and other 'exotic colors' that naturally occur in the breed are destroying the breed. FINAL THOUGHTS The overwhelming majority of birth defects are recessively inherited. Some of these inherited defects will be lethal before the age of breeding (e.g. portavenal liver shunt) but many only manifest as problems in older dogs. Normally, problems only arise when two dogs that both happen to carry the same recessive genetic defect are mated together. By the simple laws of genetics (presented in the previous section) the offspring of such a mating where neither parent actually expresses the fault (i.e. are heterozygous for it) have a 25% chance of suffering from the defect. If one parent actually expresses the fault (e.g. hip dysplasia, heart problems, cataracts) then the chance of having similarly affected puppies rises to 50%. If both parents suffer from the fault (and are therefore genetically homozygous for it), then 100% of the puppies will be affected. Our understanding of canine coat color genetics and the associated health implications is developing rapidly but, as mentioned earlier in this post, we still do not know enough. To date, there are 15 genes with known roles in canine coat color phenotypes. Many coat phenotypes result from complex and/or epistatic genetic interactions among variants within and between loci, some of which remain unidentified. Some genes involved in canine pigmentation have been linked to aural, visual and neurological impairments. Consequently, coat pigmentation in the domestic dog retains considerable ethical and economic interest. Since humans began to form domestic relationships with other species, we have revered animals that could clearly be distinguished from their wild counterparts. Animals of distinct colors could be more easily tracked, hunted or identified as owned. Whereas variations in coat color occur naturally, the proliferation of new colors and patterns in domestic animal populations has been accelerated by human interest and represents some of the earliest examples of artificial selection. Further, coat color phenotypes were among the first inherited traits to be studied by animal geneticists as they could be easily identified and are of broad public interest. Human beings value rarity or novelty and even today animals exhibiting unusual patterns or colors for their breed or species are highly valued, with higher sale prices often associated with rare or unusual coat colors in companion animals. Conversely, many dog breeds represented by formal breed registry organizations have strict regulations on accepted coat colors and patterns within the breed standard that in most cases circumscribe the breed hallmarks and may relate to breed purpose or recognizability. Animals that do not comply with these regulations may be ineligible for breed registration. So, if the reasoning for AKC supporting these breeders through the registration of these mutts is "because of money" that's definitely not an excuse. If AKC needs money, create a different type of registration for the albinos. Why are we as breeders paying ALL of this money to participate in conformation shows and strive for championships only to prove that our efforts are proving to be excellent examples of the breed standard? Why are we as breeders paying ALL of this money to make sure every single puppy we breed is registered with the AKC? (Pickwick Pugs pays for this ourselves even though most breeders have the puppy owner pay, but we want to make sure every puppy is registered as we want to support AKC and support breed preservation.) There is another rumor I heard: that AKC changed the rules because backyard breeders were threatening to lie on their registrations and call a Brindle pug a Black pug, (black pugs are solid black ... there is nothing brindle about them .... ) Still, this doesn't justify allowing mutts to be registered as purebreds. By endorsing, or giving in to these thieves (backyard breeders who are robbing future generations of the pug breed), AKC is guilty too. A is for "American" in AKC, but perhaps they are working on expanding their vocabulary .... perhaps a different A word:
I'm eagerly awaiting AKC's response. I want to see how these conflicts in purpose (AKC's mission to encourage producing "healthy, purpose-bred puppies that meet the standard" vs. AKC's support of breeders who do NOT breed "puppies that meet the standard") will ultimately be resolved. Response from AKC: Still not having had my question answered, I responded again with the following email. Hi Coady, Thank you for your response! Yes, I'm a member of the Pug Dog Club of America (PDCA) and the breed standard states clearly that there are only 2 colors -- fawn, and black -- and there are no alternate colors. So my question is why AKC does not abide by the breed standard as set by the parent club. Brindles and Albinos are not breed standard or an alternate color in any way. My point of tremendous concern is that I am finding a great confusion among the general public; uneducated pug owners assume that a pug is breed standard and healthy because it is "AKC registered". The pug owners I've spoken with who have been swindled by a less than reputable breeder into paying obscene amounts of money for these 'exotic colors' and blue-eyed, long-haired pugs then go on to bad mouth the AKC by adding "but AKC doesn't allow them to compete in dog shows." The Albino pugs AKC now allows breeders to register are going to introduce a host of health problems and I'm concerned that allowing these "exotic colors" to be endorsed by AKC will quickly destroy this ancient breed which has survived since the time of Confucius. The general public truly turns to AKC for guidance. I know AKC has to walk a tightrope to balance between preservation breeders and breeders who are newer to the pug breed who are not members of PDCA, are not able to participate in AKC conformation events, are not aware of or not willing to pay for the wonderful health testing recommended by PDCA such as PDE, PKDef, Hips etc. Reaching out to the "grass root" breeders who do not have the same resources as those who are PDCA members or who have the benefit of feedback from participation in conformation events, is important and AKC is wise to continue being a resource for everyone and keep doors open. Reaching out, educating, and helping breeders maintain standards of excellence will help these ancient breeds continue to thrive into the 21st century. I understand that "the village" includes all breeders, not just preservation breeders. When I was the president of our local music teacher group, many members did not want to accept teachers who did not have college degrees or "who did not teach Bach" or "who taught only pop music" or "only taught by rote and never taught the student to read music" etc. But the purpose of the group, a local affiliated with the Music Teachers National Association, was to raise the standards of music education. Mentorship was the answer. We all have something to learn from each other. As it turned out, the elitist teachers learned a few business tricks and motivational tricks from these new members who in return received the benefits of learning from the more experienced teachers who had years of formal training. The mission statement of AKC states that it "was founded in 1884 ... to advocate for the purebred dog ," My husband and I are so grateful for AKC's tremendous efforts to "advance canine health and well-being, work to protect the rights of all dog owners and promote responsible dog ownership .... and to "advocate for dog owner rights, and educate the public about responsible dog ownership". I have a friend who works in the legal department for AKC and she enlightened me to some of the myriad of challenges AKC deals with on a daily basis to fight for our right to simply own a pet, yet alone a purebred dog. Our lives are fuller being able to own and love and cherish pugs. They are our children essentially. Our family. I am tremendously grateful for these efforts. I am tremendously grateful for all AKC does for pet owners and their pets. However, as a preservation breeder and lifelong owner of this amazing pug breed, I also feel I would be neglect not to voice my tremendous concern over AKC's endorsement of albino and brindle pugs since they do not meet breed standard, and they WILL introduce (at least the albino and merle and blue eyed) a host of health concerns. Additionally, as I mentioned earlier, the decision to allow exotic colors to be registered is ultimately causing bad publicity among the owners of these mixed-breeds since they are not allowed to compete in dog shows. It's a double standard. Double standards are unethical. If we had allowed the self-taught teachers into our music teacher group, yet then dumby-downed our student competitions so that there were no sight-reading requirements, and allowed students to play chopsticks, never teach scales, or encourage other styles of music, and allowed students to play chopsticks in any rhythm they chose, on any pitches they chose, the ultimate result would be cacophony and the ultimate loss of the wonderful art form of music. https://youtu.be/U2WlMXBjZ4Y Might there be a way to allow breeders who produce puggles, and blue-eyed albino, and brindle pugs etc., to register the pug through the AKC Canine Partners program? This would allow owners of "exotic color pugs" that are mixes , not pure-bred, to participate in agility, rally obedience, barn hunt, work toward CGC and tricks titles, and a way for AKC to earn money and encourage participation in all of the wonderful opportunities provided to pet owners .... yet not destroy this ancient breed. I think other PDCA member breeders might be fearful of speaking up at the risk of losing AKC's support. I know it would be much more challenging for us to be able to find amazing studs and purchase exceptional representations of the breed if we were not able to continue participating in AKC conformation and earn championships. Holding a UKC championship, for example, would just result in a chuckle and hold no weight. It would be very challenging for us if we were not part of the mainstream. I know the powerful resources of AKC could be turned against us just as easily as they are used to help protect us as preservation breeders and dog owners. I know it's a great risk to speak up and voice my concerns and I hope it does not affect our efforts as ethical preservation breeders. However, I do not want to see this incredible, ancient breed disappear into mediocrity and become an all-american mix breed simply because we were all too busy or too fearful to uphold standards of excellence, integrity, and honesty. To fight against ignorance, complacency, and greed. The breed deserves our efforts especially in America now since pug breeders, along with other brachycephalic breeds, are being challenged abroad like in the Netherlands. The answer of course is not through adding a longer muzzle and destroying the ancient breed, but rather in health testing, accountability, and higher standards among breeders to include only the very best breathers in their breeding programs -- those pugs who do not suffer from pinched nares, elongated soft palate issues etc. The only breeders willing to rip off the general public by selling "exotic colors" are breeders who do not participate in AKC events and who are not interested in breeding to standard or supporting research for the breed. If AKC is truly to abide by its mission statement "to advocate for the purebred dog", then I believe it is important that AKC not provide recognition and endorsement of these breeders who are not interested in the preservation of the breed. It is important for AKC to help preservation breeders fight for, not destroy this ancient breed. How can we do this? What can be done? How can we educate? How can we maintain the standard? I want to be involved. I'd love to learn more about the reasonings behind allowing Brindles and White albino pugs being allowed to receive AKC registration. I'm fearful there was a slip through a crack.. My father worked for NASA so I know that with larger organizations it's possible for one department to be completely unaware of something happening in another department. Perhaps this was just a huge mistake? I hope that is the case and that AKC will rectify this so that only pugs who meet the breed standard as determined by the parent club, PDCA, can receive AKC registration and so that AKC can uphold and honor its mission statement formed in 1884. Thank you so much, Amy McLelland Screenshot:
Pickwick Pugs does not recommend early spay/neuter. We recommend no sooner than 12-18 months of age. Why? Watch this video of a veterinarian with Troy Animal Hospital to understand more. We recommend neutering males after growth stops (so average around 12-18 months of age ... aim for closer to 2 years of age then.) With females, never before the first estrus, (even better, waiting for 2 cycles). Most females have their first cycle around 6 months of age, so, waiting until a bit over a year of age for the spay will allow for the possibility of 2 cycles before the spay. There is much controversy in the profession but we feel more data is needed (specifically regarding pugs and other stocky smaller breeds) before making breed-specific recommendations. Why are we so against early spay/neuter at Pickwick Pugs? It has been proven many times (most recently in 2020 by respected researchers at UC Davis) that heavier dogs have higher health risks if neutered or spayed early before the age of one year (refer to UC Davis 10 year study below and links to other studies). It has been proven that the risk of a joint disorder could be THREE to FOUR times greater with dogs neutered early than in dogs left intact (larger breed dogs). Pugs are a stocky breed. While small, they have large bodies to cart around on those 4 tiny legs. The pug breed as a whole (not Pickwick Pugs, thankfully) often deal with hip, patellar, and other joint issues. Gradually, more and more pug breeders are including hip xrays and other joint health screening in their breeding programs. The problem is that pugs are compared with other breeds and pugs are simply built differently. So, most breeders fee it is a complete waste of money. I agree, however, we need more pug x-rays in the database so that doctors can compare pugs with pugs when assigning a rating/score, instead of pugs with Labradors, or other breeds. That's why we include hip X-rays in Pickwick's health screening . . . . not because we put much stock in the rating, but because it will help the FUTURE of the breed once more and more breeders participate. Health screening aside, and back to the topic at hand -- early spay/neuter -- UNTIL WE KNOW THE CAUSE of Pug Myleopathy and other disorders the breed encounters, why compromise any chance we have of allowing the bones to fully form and mature? (Have you seen the wheelie pugs in the Facebook groups? The numbers are ever increasing). If there is even the slightest chance that delaying the spay/neuter a few more months will help prevent having to carry our pugs around in his/her last years because the hips have worn out and they can't even walk outside to relieve themselves, or prevent having to pay a fortune to deal with a "wheel chair" for a senior pug, isn't it worth it? Until hip and joint problems are a thing of the past in the breed at large, why take the risk with early spay/neuter? We should be doing everything possible to ensure each pug lives a healthy, long life. Pugs need strong, solid legs with lots of bone and muscle to support those stocky bodies for decades of life on this gravity-laden earth. So, if a few more months prior to neuter/spay helps to prevent a joint disorder ... even possibly helps ... why even consider early spay neuter? The theory is that once altered, the pug will no longer have behavioral issues. That's simply not true. Pugs need training. Pugs are smart. If you don't continue the training started in the Puppy K and basic obedience classes when they are puppies ..... they will start to create mischief because they are bored. In fact, about the time owners stop training the puppy is when the pug "looks" like an adult (around 8 months or so) and is grown. But puberty is not the time to start ignoring a child .... puppy .... in fact, training is even more important now. Problem behavior comes from boredom and lack of training, not the dog. Pugs are smart. They will find their own way to entertain themselves, so you might start seeing things like teeth marks in furniture, door frames, or puddles in shoes or piles of laundry. Your pug is trying to communicate, "I'm bored. I'm frustrated. I have these weird hormonal surges and I'm confused. Why don't we do those clicker games any more? I still don't understand that 'leave it' thing. Can you explain it again? Why don't we go on outings any more? I'm tired of staring out the window. That neighbor's cat has more fun than I do." Spay/neuter does not equal training. A daily walk does not replace training. Only "brain walks" tire those smart brains out. On a daily basis. So add things like sniffer mats, licker mats, puzzles, learn a new trick, proof and old trick (can your dog do a down with a hand signal only? verbal cue only when you're in the other room? can your dog stay in that down while you walk around it? can your dog 'leave it' when the treat is actually sitting on his paw?) Play hide and seek in the house. Go to a new place so your dog can see/smell new sights/sounds. And make sure your pug has tons of human contact several times a day to release oxytocin. Only these things will help prevent behavioral problems in a pug. If you are particularly busy at work or elsewhere, hire a trainer to come to the house several times a week, and a dog walker to come daily. The theory is that a dog will stop "humping" its toy or other dogs if neutered. This is not true. We have had seniors (who were neutered as puppies) continue to 'mount' females and try to do their deed even into their senior years. The theory is that a dog, male or female, will stop marking or having accidents in the house if spayed or neutered. This is not true. Trust us. The only thing that prevents this is LOTS of potty breaks and praise/treats after each deed ... not just as puppies when first training, but periodically and randomly throughout life. (Also, all pug owners know to never leave a pile of dirty clothes or plastic bags on the floor .... even the best trained pug can't resist certain things. Ha.) Sometimes, 'accidents' occur because the pug is trying to tell us something. It's one way they have to communicate with us. So, again, spay/neuter will not 'solve' this problem either. There is a theory that early spay/neuter will help a dog who is having behavioral problems (being aggressive with another dog or something similar). The real cure for this is training, conditioning, and daily mental brain work. Jeff and I (Amy) know first hand from owning smart pugs since 1990 .... an idle mind is the devil's workshop. Some daycares do not allow intact dogs, however, we have found some wonderful ones who are 'show dog friendly' and have ways of allowing interaction with other dogs safely, always monitored closely, (of course never when a pug is in season). Princess Buttercup, Champion Macintosh, Lilly, and other Pickwick show pugs who were intact were able to participate in their daycare and inhouse training. It was worth every penny. Shop around. You'll find the right facility/trainer who is open to working with a 6, 8, 10 month intact puppy. It's possible to not just survive, but also thrive, a few extra months in this world with an intact dog, so consider waiting until a year or closer to a year before spay/neuter. Sometimes it's necessary to do an earlier spay/neuter for a health concern, (perhaps a really bad umbilical hernia), but remember that any time a pug goes under anesthesia, there is a risk, so don't take these procedures lightly and savor every second you have with your pug. Yes, there are studies which suggest that early spay/neuter does not affect small breeds but, again, pugs are built VERY DIFFERENTLY than other small breeds. At Pickwick pugs, our philosophy is that many more tests and studies are needed on this breed specifically before the verdict is in on early spay/neuter. Here is the 2020 study by UC Davis along with other links. For us, the verdict is still out, despite what our vets tell us. Yes, we want to prevent unwanted pregnancies but not at the risk of reducing the quality of our pugs' lives. That's our philosophy at least. Data on the consequences of early sterilization continues to mountTony McReynolds - 8/27/2020
Researchers at the University of California, Davis (UC Davis), had a busy July: They published two separate studies on the health risks associated with early neutering and spaying of dogs. One study focused on 35 specific dog breeds, the other on mixed-breed dogs. The first study found that health risks based on sterilization age varied widely depending on breed. Both found that heavier dogs have higher health risks if neutered or spayed early before the age of one year. These findings are in line with the 2019 AAHA Canine Life Stage Guidelines, which recommend neutering large-breed male dogs after growth stops (approximately 9–15 months of age). Recommendations for female dogs are more nuanced and require clinical discretion combined with comprehensive owner education in an effort to balance the benefit of decreasing mammary neoplasia and unwanted litters when done earlier (before the first estrus) versus decreasing the risk of orthopedic disease, some cancers, and urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence if performed later (after growth stops).* NEWStat reached out to Benjamin Hart, DVM, PhD, professor emeritus at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, and the lead author of both studies, to find out more. Hart said his interest in the topic was piqued 10 years ago by the findings of several previous studies that suggested neutering and spaying could increase the risk of certain cancers such as lymphoma or hemangiosarcoma, as well as the risk of joint disorders such as cranial cruciate ligament rupture or hip dysplasia. However, Hart said, those studies didn’t mention what breeds the researchers studied, or even the ages of the dogs at the time of sterilization. “The information wasn’t clinically useful,” Hart said. So he launched a 10-year study that looked at breed differences using 15 years of data from thousands of dogs at the UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. “We found major breed differences and even sex differences in disease risk,” he said. They decided to focus their studies on 35 breeds that showed significant differences. Hart and his colleagues discovered that in some larger breeds, the risk of a joint disorder could be three to four times greater than in dogs left intact. The risk of cancers was unchanged. Other than the unchanged risk of cancers, Hart said sterilization wasn’t associated with an increase in joint disorders in small dogs. The second study grew out of the first, said Hart: “Once we got about two-thirds through the purebred paper, we decided we needed to do something with mixed-breed dogs, since most pet breeds are mixed.” The mixed-breed study examined dogs in five weight categories. “For dogs weighing 43 pounds and over, [sterilization] at the age of 6 to 11 months correlated with a major increase in risk for one or more joint disorders.” However, as with small-breed dogs, [sterilization] did not increase the risk of the cancer in any weight category. Hart says his team’s findings are significant, especially in the case of mixed-breed shelter adoptions: Figuring out how big a dog might get is problematic if you don’t know anything about his parents, which can complicate questions about when best to sterilize. To account for that uncertainty, Hart suggested that shelters and humane societies should consider adopting a standard of sterilizing at over a year of age for dogs who will grow into large sizes. If you’re attending Connexity, don’t miss “Hey Doc, When Should I Spay my Dog?” Highlights from the Reproductive Health Section of the 2019 AAHA Canine Life Stage Guidelines for more information on this topic. Photo credit: © Gettyimages/Merriman "Pugs are not German Shepherds." Two very experienced and knowledgeable breeders recently said this when discussing a concern Jeff and I see in the pug show rings lately . . . . over angulated rears, (or working dog rear, or a European rear) or, an acute angulation of the hock joint than is normal for the breed. (I'm not an artist and the 2nd thigh is a bit too long in this drawing, but you get the gist) . . . This is unnatural and dangerously compromises the pug breed (or any breed). I recently saw a pug in the ring who was free stacked (standing naturally) but, when turning its head around to see what was behind it, its rear joints disclocated basically, and when viewing these pugs from behind when they are gaiting it's a nightmare to see with the rear pads pointing in all sorts of different directions. Dogs with over-angulation result in sickle hocks .... the dog can’t extend his hocks properly while he trots, and that will restrict the driving force of his hind legs, and therefore reduce the power in his rear. A dog with sickle hocks has a poorly synchronized gait which destroys the dog’s efficiency. Even if the dog is just "a pet" it will still impact the pleasure he has going for long walks and playing fetch. A dog with sickle hocks will have no follow-through (sort of like in a golf swing). The descriptive term, "sickle hocks" comes from the farm tool . . . . A dog with sickle hocks usually stands with is rear pasterns slightly forward in order to support weak hindquarters. When trotting, his top line will bob up and down which results in wasted energy. Instead of moving forward with power, the dog's energy goes "up and down". Also, if pugs have too much leg (length of leg) you've lost the "multum in parvo" (a lot in a little) by putting those stocky pug bodies on skinny legs. Type is lost ... it's no longer a pug. Granted, straight fronts and rears with no angles are just as bad and that has been a problem with the pug breed for a long time. This places too much stress on joints yet, for generations, people use the excuse that a pug is simply "a ladies lap dog" (quoting our good friend and longtime breeder). We have heard TOO many times in the ring, when addressing poor movement in pugs, "well, it's a pug .... it's a head breed." Hello -- it has 4 legs -- it's a dog -- and it needs to be able to walk and move easily. (Again, quoting my friend): "All dogs are head breeds" so this is a bogus excuse breeders and judges use for poor movement in pugs. So why worry about all this if you "just want a pet pug and don't care if it's a show pug"? Well, you tell us. Do you like to take long walks with your dog? Does your dog love playing fetch? Perhaps you would like your pug to try agility or another fun sport, or perhaps even just have the means to give that squirrel in the backyard a run for its money. So, while it might look flashy in the show ring with some judges now (at least when it's hand stacked and viewed from the side .... and, incidentally, not judges who understand pugs), it still remains that sickle hocks limit what the dog can do with you comfortably, and without pain. More importantly, a sound dog is less likely to “break down” from injury; the dog will experience less fatigue, be able to take those long walks with you, and show greater efficiency in work (even if it’s only to help you corral those squirrels). A sound dog stays healthier and more active throughout its life. This is why it's important to look for reputable breeders who strive to breed sound, strong, healthy pugs. When you think "I don't want a show dog", think about what you're actually saying. If you could pick out a pug to own, which one of these would you pick? Our rescue pug, Charlie Chaplin, is "fiddle front" (Chippendale above) and his rear legs are off too. The family who rehomed him to us said they bought him from a friend (or relative) who lived close by. He has no AKC registration or papers, no pedigree. He's the sweetest pug on earth but, obviously, his parents did not have correct, sound conformation. We've had to do surgery for luxating patella and we watch him 'break down' as he ages. If he had been built more like the dog in figure 1, he would be aging much better with regard to joints and movement and would still be able to have those "grand battement" kicks after every potty outside. (So dramatic). So what should proper angulation look like in a pug? What is healthy, beautiful, strong, and balanced? The hocks should NOT extend much beyond the point of the rump. Here are some photos of correct angulation from a fabulous book by Lea Clarke (highly recommended this book!) . . It is also important that the front is in balance with the rear -- which helps avoid pressure on other joints and bones. "Nature hates imbalance." Rears break down, hips - patellas. The breed standard for pugs asks for MODERATE angulation. The ideal is a moderate slope at 30 degrees where the topline is level and the tailset high. This gives a good swing forwards and backwards which allows for powerful drive. Symmetrical proportions of the parts in relation to each other . . . . Dogs with good balance and (appropriate, moderate) angulation will have a smoother stride. A well-balanced dog will look sounder, more fit, and healthier. The Central Line of Gravity "The line of gravity is an imaginary vertical line from the center of gravity to the ground or surface that an object, a person, or a moving body is on. It is the direction that gravity is acting upon the person or object. . . . .It is with his rear legs gravitating slightly towards the center line that also gives the pug his slight roll. It is correct that a pug dog moves slightly towards the COG coming and going." "In humans and canines, body structure and movement can be related to overall health. If a human has legs that are bowed out or in, or if the spine is curved, that person is likely to suffer pain from pressure. If bones are not in the right place and cannot do the job they are meant to do, this puts pressure on other bones and joints. The same as dogs." The dog in photo a has a 45 degree shoulder lay back and upper arm lay in. Her topline is level and strong. Notice that pug in photo a meets the Pug Standard of "wide chest, well ribbed and legs well under body". Now observe how these angles affect movement . . . . Perhaps let's close this blog with a photo of Secretariat .. the perfect horse. And, to quote my breeder friend again, "it's important to remember that breed standards are largely patterned after horse standards." I'm remembering something my Grandfather was fond of saying .... "everything in moderation". This seems to apply to almost everything in life, even dog breeding! Adding extreme angulation is not the answer. To quote another amazing pug breeder (who is also an AKC judge), "The pug breed standard calls for moderate angulation. Over angulation is not correct, and the movement issue is correlated with structure not being able to compensate for it. I truly hate seeing straight stifles. But over angulation is just as bad."
Tory (Pickwick's Worship the Ground I Walk On), Mr Drysdale (Pickwick's High Falutin') and Jethro (Pickwick's Livin' in High Cotton) are rocking the rings this month picking up lots of Best of Breeds and other awards at shows in Columbiana and Perry, GA. The hi-lite for us (especially as breeders) was Tory's wins and compliments from judge Jason Hoke, who was her judge in Perry, GA one day, and who has also judged and at the Pug Dog Club of America nationals. He is very knowledgeable about the pug breed so his many compliments of Tory were so appreciated and made us happy to have confirmation that we are on the right track. He loved Tory's underjaw and fill (and other qualities he listed) and said that we are losing this in the breed. As I exited the ring I said "I guess she's a more old-fashioned type pug" and he said "no, she's correct." Wow. He awarded Tory Winners Bitch AND Best Bred by Exhibitor. We traded that card in for an awesome Purina towel! We did not attend the Pug National Convention the year Mr. Hoke judged but we watched the videos and also his workshop and talk to the breeders at the banquet. He warned breeders that the pigment and wrinkles are the hallmark of the breed, and they are being lost. He challenged the members/breeders to work on this. I'm glad Tory and all of the Pickwick Pugs in our breeding program have amazing pigment. Doris, Scarlett, and other amazing pugs we have bred even had a perfect diamond! Mr Drysdale and Jethro both entered their first BPUP (Beginner Puppy 4-6 month) and took turns winning Best of Breed each day. Note to self: when bringing siblings into the ring, try to find a class before hand where they get used to 'ignoring' each other. They just thought it was a swell time and a chance to play! As one fellow exhibitor friend said "they were very entertaining" lol. Mr Drysdale even went onto win the Toy Group the day he won Best of Breed! Here is his win photo. Here is Mr Drysdale and Jethro showing off the wins .... And here are a few shots of Jethro and Mr Drysdale in their first BPUP . . . And Mr Drysdale in his first Best in Show! (Our amazing vet took the photos ... thank you, Dr. Williams!) Tory won Winners Bitch, Best of Winners, Best of Breed at her first show in the Columbiana Cluster. Judge Fred Bassett REALLY liked her and had so many wonderful compliments about her. And she won Winners Bitch and Best of Breed the other day she showed as well with this wonderful judge who ALSO awarded Mr Drysdale 1st place in the BPUP Toy Group. Camping at the Fairgrounds in Perry, Georgia with 9 pugs was very adventurous to say the least. A horrible wind and rain storm ruined the camper awning but we hunkered down inside. Camping with be like . . . We did have a couple of days with divine weather, though, and enjoyed lots of walks and training on the wonderful (and flat!) fairgrounds. Sebastian came along for a change of scenery. Traveling is stressful but I think he enjoyed being able to smell new things and feel the nice breeze on the days with good weather. Lilly, Buttercup, Miss Dior, Bridget, and Lilibeth also tagged along on the trip for fun (they didn't compete in any shows). I think they enjoyed the sights, smells, and adventure as well. Here is Lilly (Pickwick's Thrill on Blueberry Hill). She never liked showing very much so I'm sure she was happy to just hang out and train. There weren't enough pugs present at either of the clusters for a major (there were 6 bitches in Perry, but Georgia requires 8! for a 3 point major ... crazy) but at least we collected some more points AND had a ton of fun. Honestly, Tory is a natural in the ring and so easy to show. Her temperament is FLAWLESS and those cute BPUP boys Drysdale and Jethro are getting the hang of it ;)
One of the absolute hardest parts of dog breeding is placing pups. Even though we know what amazing homes they're going to, it's honestly like sending a human kid off to college .... multiplied by 100. Even harder? Placing an older pup that you let "grow out" .... a pick of the litter. In Scarlett's case, she was the pick of 4 different litters and she honestly is truly amazing. But the facts are, we simply can't keep as many pugs as we'd like because the grumble just gets too large and less manageable. And, these truly remarkable ones need a special home of their very own. Our home is awesome and we enjoy life in a large grumble sort of way but the 'brilliant' and 'old soul' pugs just seem to thrive with more one-on-one time. Scarlett is definitely a brilliant, old soul. Yes, Scarlett is beautiful, but it was her temperament and brains that called me ..... that eye contact (from a truly young age) was beyond amazing and it was always as if she was reading our minds. Tomorrow, Scarlett will be flying to Virginia with her new family to begin the next chapter of her life, so it just seemed that a camping trip to spend time with her and a few other pugs was fitting. We snuggled by the campfire, took some nice walks, and just sat silently listening to wind, birds, leaves rustling. We took time to savor and I think I'll treasure these memories. I know she'll be too busy with her amazing new family and I pray she moves on with zest and no looking back .... but, perhaps, there will be a smell or taste or sound where she remembers her year with us and treasures the memory as much as we will treasure her for the rest of our lives. It's like this with all the pups who leave us but there are certain ones who leave such a mark and Scarlett is one of them. I know some Pickwick pug owners understand how these guys are our children, even when they "go away to camp" -- forever camp -- and we hope you know HOW MUCH we appreciate the photos and updates. We get to continue to live beside them through your updates .... even though we are miles apart. When we never hear from owners we worry so much .... did the pug die? Did the owner die? Did the owner have to surrender the pug to rescue? Is the pug happy? Is the pug blind? Is the pug beautiful? Is the pug behaving? We understand totally if things happen ... that's life. We've lost dogs tragically over the years through house fires or freak accidents. But we'd rather know if something happens than always wonder. Some people are private and we totally get that. That's part of the price we as breeders risk when part with the pup. We also understand how busy folks' lives get but, when we don't ever hear anything, then we worry that the owners are too busy even for the pug. So, just in case gentle readers and dog owners don't know how much even just one photo means to us, I thought I'd share that here. It's a bit like with human children .... you never ever stop worrying about them no matter how many years go by. We got back from our camping trip just in time to swing by the vet to get Scarlett's health certificate. She is SUCH a healthy pug and so beautiful. I could tell the vet and the vet tech were questioning our judgement to place her but, in the end as they saying goes, "you can't keep them all" and she is going to THE most amazing home. She'll be joining a senior female pug so I've been lecturing Scarlett about how important it is to treat her elders with respect. She looks at me as if she understands, lol, so we shall see! But what great memories for me from last week's camping trip at Monte Sano Mountain in Huntsville, Alabama. Purebred pugs come in two colors: fawn, and black. "Off" colors such as white (albino), brindle, blue merle, blue-eyed, fluffy dogs are NOT pugs and are produced via mixed breeding and as such may introduce health issues that do not occur in the breed. Words like "designer", "rare", "exotic", "boutique breeds" are just euphemisms for mutts. Don't be fooled and don't allow these willfully ignorant and greedy breeders to con you and destroy the beloved pug breed which has survived since the time of Confucius. Only support preservation breeders who adhere to breed standard. If you are reading this, you probably love pugs or know someone who does. Yet, there are unethical breeders (who have the gall to call themselves "breeders with integrity") who are destroying the pug breed. It is important to educate people so that these breeders do not con anyone into being a part of eliminating this amazing breed from this earth. This incredible breed has survived most likely since the time of Confucius. It has survived OVER 2,000 years! This breed has survived since 500 BC (before Christ) because actual breeders with integrity adhered to a standard and ONLY bred pugs that met the standard. These preservation breeders (who actually are breeders with integrity) only bred pugs who looked like pugs and not chihuahuas .... pugs who were black or fawn with a black mask and not blue, spotted, fluffy, or blue-eyed pugs. They did not breed mutts, they bred pugs. This is what it takes to preserve a breed from the time of Confucius to the 21st century but when puppy buyers support unethical breeders who do not care about the breed, and purchase off-colors like white or brindle or blue merle or even 'fluffy' mutts called pugs, then these puppy buyers are being swindled, paying a ton of money for a mutt, and ALSO helping to ELMINATE this amazing, ancient breed from the face of this earth. What if dalmation breeders had decided to start producing dogs without any spots at all? Or dalmations with short legs? Or dalmations with long hair? Or reversing the dots? Or, lord forbid, blue merle dalmations? It's no longer a dalmation! It has become a mutt. Do you see the point yet? If you are a true pug lover, support only preservation breeders and be a part in preserving this amazing breed. When a puppy buyer supports a breeder who purposefully breeds against the breed standard, they are helping to destroy the breed. Yes, oopsies happen (and you might be surprised how many dogs in animal shelters -- even big dogs -- have pug in their DNA!) but rescue is an entirely different subject. This blog post is addressing the swindler breeders who are purposefully breeding and promoting "rare" and "exotic" mutts which they call pugs, then charging 3 and 4 times as much for these mutts, introducing a host of health problems, and ultimately trying to destroy the pug breed. When naive puppy buyers fall for these unethical breeders' schemes, they are a part of this destruction of the pug breed. Help to educate your friends so they are not swindled. Help educate your friends to ONLY support preservation breeders and help save the pug breed. It's as simple as sharing a link to the breed standard with them! (But you might also want to point out the increased risk of so many health problems they'll be dealing with, or the fact that they're helping these swindlers destroy the pug breed.) If you want to add more color, just invest in tutus and fancy attire, or earn them some fancy ribbons and titles . . . . . don't destroy an ancient breed that has been around since the time of Confucius.
|
AuthorAmy - Concert pianist, composer, lecturer, teacher, adjudicator, pug lover, dog trainer, soap and candle maker, owner Unique Boutique for Pet Owners, and co-owner Pickwick Pugs along with her husband, Dr. Jeff McLelland, concert organist, music director, and awesome care giver of the grumble. Categories |